Relic

August 30, 2020 at 5:49 pm | Posted in 2020 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ½

This new Australian horror films starts with the perfect opening scene. We watch a bathtub overflowing and then following the water to floor, out in the hall, down the stairs, where it pools around someone’s feet. She turns sideways toward us and we think, maybe, something moved in the darkness behind her. Great moments like that are the foundation for horror. And I was excited that the film started that way; I had hopes for where it would lead. Unfortunately, it doesn’t really get any more suspenseful for most of the film. It does a great job of maintaining a constant, lingering tension. And sometimes it teases something more (like the great scene where Emily Mortimer looks under the bed). But it does not ratchet up the dread in the way great horror films do. It is just mostly foreboding. At less than 90 minutes, maybe that is all it needs to be, and the final 30 minutes do begin building tension effectively. Once the daughter goes exploring the closet, the story starts building toward its climax. The ending is unexpected and may confuse people, but I found it sweet/disturbing/interesting. This is a film that is clearly also about aging, isolation, and the slow decay of the mind, and from that perspective, I think the ending works. The acting is wonderful, especially from Robyn Nevin as the old woman. This was writer/director Natalie Erika James’s first feature length film; I will be very curious to see what she does next. This film won’t linger long in my memory, but I am glad I saw it. I would call it more suspense than horror, and it did a fine job at creating and sustaining suspense. But, be warned, if you are not a fan of black mold, you might want to steer clear.

 

True History of the Kelly Gang

August 14, 2020 at 10:27 am | Posted in 2020 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ½

Ned Kelly is Australia’s criminal cult icon. He is their Billy the Kid. A bad guy who did bad things but is beloved for his rebellion against authority. He’s their cultural Robin Hood. As such, he has shown up in virtually every artistic form: plays, novels, poetry, TV shows, video games, and some ten films since “The Story of the Kelly Gang” in 1906. This version seems to want to stray far from the 2004 Heath Ledger and Orlando Bloom vehicle, “Ned Kelly.” Where that one was a big, very standard Hollywood film, this one has all the sharp edges and messiness of an indie flick. From the first time you see the adult Kelly with short cropped hair in front of the British flag, looking just like he stepped out of a 70s punk band, this movie announces its anarchic intentions. This isn’t a feel good biopic. It’s rough, angry, chaotic, and strangely erotic. Kelly is played by George MacKay (who has been a standout in films like “Captain Fantastic,” and “1917”). He currently seems to be circling the edges of stardom, and I bet he’ll be a household name in a few years. He is magnetic here, erupting all over the screen as the volatile Kelly. This Kelly does not look destined to be a beloved hero. He’s moody, impetuous, insecure, and so very very angry. And he is driven by an almost Oedipal enmeshment with his mother that seems to undergird so many of his choices. He pinballs around the movie smashing into things in every direction and, if he becomes any sort of hero at all, it’s quite by accident. It’s a terrific performance that propels the film forward. Other actors, including Charlie Hunnam, Russel Crowe, and Nicholas Hoult do just fine in their roles, but this is really MacKay’s movie. I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the other edgy (one might say anarchic) and surprising element to the film: its not so subtle homo-eroticism. MacKay’s Kelly barely seems to notice his wife, but there is a sexual tension and deep longing need between him and gang member Joe Byrne (Sean Kennan). Also, the gang members spend most of their time in dresses. I could not find anything to corroborate this as historical fact. It’s visually arresting and keeps the whole story at a strange tilt for the audience, which does seem to be exactly what it’s trying to do. Like I said, this is not a regular Hollywood movie, and it is much better of for it.

First Cow

August 4, 2020 at 1:33 pm | Posted in 2020 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

It’s funny to think that I was actually excited for this film. I had seen a preview in the theaters some time in December or January. It looked like my sort of movie: a thoughtful, small budget, independent film. Perhaps, I was expecting great character development, acting, and storytelling. One of the things that draws me to smaller movies is the idea that the story can go anywhere, rather than in the standard formulaic arc. I didn’t exactly get what I was looking for. I do not mind slow moving, pensive films, but this one was mind-numbingly slow. We were ten minutes into the film before the first word was uttered. The film had very little dialogue and no soundtrack, resulting in a film that was filled largely with just background sound. Also, the titular bovine finally drifts into the film for a brief appearance about 30 minutes in, and she doesn’t feature into the plot at all until halfway through the movie. That is a long time to not know where this film is going, and it was hard to stay engaged. The story did start with a compelling enough mystery: two skeletons found buried on an island. But the ending made no sense; I understand why the one guy died, why did the other one? He seemed perfectly healthy when he lay down next to his friend. For the main hook of the film to not deliver is really problematic. Also, I couldn’t help but notice that the place where the bones were found was significantly different from where the men lay down. Am I to believe that it really changed that much in less than 200 years? Likewise, the dialogue did not sound authentic to me. This film presumably takes place in the latter 1800s, but some diction and slang did not sound authentic (did people use a term like “window of opportunity” in the 1800s?). I couldn’t help but think of Robert Eggers, who is a master at creating authentic period language in films like “The With” and “The Lighthouse.” This film also made some very strange casting choices. Two of it’s three known actors, Alia Shawkat and Rene Auberjonois, were both in brief roles where they didn’t have a single line. This must have been Auberjonois’s last film (he died in December). He’s a great actor, and yet he was hardly used, while larger key roles were often filled with actors of lesser skill. Toby Jones was the only established actor with a large role. In the end, there is just nothing here for me to recommend. Even for free, I think this will feel like a waste of time.

The Half of It

August 3, 2020 at 11:29 am | Posted in 2020 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊

“The Half of it” is another casualty of the Corona-era. It would have had a wide, in-theater release, but has now been released on Netflix. It’s hard to know how well it would have done in theaters, but this does seem like the sort of “indie” film that becomes a runaway success. It is indie, but only to the degree that we don’t know any of the actors/director. It follows a very normal story arc and pace; it does not challenge the audience in any meaningful way. That said, though, it’s pretty good fluff. Ellie is the smarter-than-everyone-else kid stuck in a small town. She makes an unlikely friend, falls in love, and grows a little wiser. This is hardly rocket science. The coming-of-age story is one of the oldest genres, and even the gay coming-of-age story has been the focus of dozens of films. Most of the acting is fairly awkward, but Leah Lewis (who has only done bit parts on tv before now) does give a strong and charming performance as Ellie. The most interesting part of the film for me was her relationship with her father. That was lovely and sweet, and I wish the film had spent more time there. Writer and director Alice Wu (her only other film is “Saving Face”) does sometimes lean too heavily on stereotypes: the smartest kid is the Asian girl, her friend is the dumb but sweet jock, the antagonist (if there even is one) is the dumb and self-involved jock, etc. Perhaps, the most interested thing for me in the film was it’s winking self-awareness of the tropes it was ripping off. How do you make an original love story/coming-of-age-story? By acknowledging how much you are borrowing from elsewhere. The film itself is basically a modern “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Wu knows this and both points it out explicitly and has fun with it. At one point Ellie and Paul (sweet jock) are watching an old film (clips of them feature heavily throughout) . They watch a man running alongside the train, calling out to the woman through the window. Ellie calls it “kinda trite,” tacitly acknowledging the triteness in much of this film. In another scene, she is accused of ripping off Wim Wenders (a famous indie director) in a letter she writes. The entire film acknowledges these sorts of ripoffs, even while engaging in them. The film starts with an overt reference to “Hedwig and the Angry Inch.” It’s from that reference that the film gets its title; and then it gleefully upends that message in the final scenes. There are also clear references to “The Graduate” (in the wedding scene) and “The Usual Suspects” (a teacher gives a bastardized quotation of “the only one I fear is Keyser Soze”). The film can definitely be a bit too cutesy and contrived at times, but that’s the genre. So, if you’re not up for that, I’d definitely go elsewhere. But, if you do want something light, fun, and easy to watch, this might just be the perfect choice.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.