The Rider

April 29, 2018 at 5:36 pm | Posted in 2018 | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ½

I had two moments that hit like lightening during this film. First, I watch the lead character, Brady Blackburn, taming a horse. As I watched, I noticed the horse’s eyes and suddenly realized, “this horse isn’t ‘acting.’ This horse is genuinely wild and getting tamed right in front of me.” The second moment came when Brady visited his friend Lane Scott in rehab. Lane, a former Bronco rider, has been severely disabled in an accident. Watching him, and seeing video of his pre-accident, I realized he was also not acting. This person on screen had really ridden horses and is now really disabled. As it turns out, he is also really named Lane Scott. Scott had been an up-and-coming star in the bronco circuit before being severely disabled in 2013. In fact, Brady Blackburn turns out to be Brady Jandreau in real life. He was also a rising bronco star before a horse bucked him and stepped on his head. This film is the somewhat fictionalized version of his life story, and it seems that everyone is pretty much playing themselves. The father and sister in the film are his real life family. Everyone’s character has her/his own first name. Some family names have been changed, but all of Brady’s rodeo friends are playing themselves. This explains why the dialogue can sometimes feel clunky; these are not professional actors. But, that is more than made up for by the clear love and connection these people feel for each other. Jandreau is not an actor but, for this role, he did not need to be. There are many moments where the character Brady clearly blurs with the Brady playing him. In those moments, his emotions are so present and real and touching. Just like we watched Jandreau really tame a horse on screen, we are given the privilege of watching him tame his own ghosts as well. This is as close to a documentary as fiction can get. Visually and emotionally stunning, this is one of the best films I am likely to see this year.

Avengers: Infinity War

April 29, 2018 at 5:09 pm | Posted in 2018 | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊

After a decade of teasing and flirting, “it” has finally arrived. And when I say “it,” I mean the culmination of 15 years of planning on the part of Marvel Comics to lift themselves out of bankruptcy and make their cadre of superheroes relevant again. And, relevant they have certainly become. “Avengers: Infinity War” has just had the highest grossing weekend of all time, at $250M. That is quite the turnaround for a company that was basically dead by the end of the 90s. The question, though, is, “can this film live up to a decade of hype?” You could certainly be forgiven for thinking that no film could, especially one of this scope. With over 30 named characters who have been central to previous films, there were a lot of moving parts this story had to manage. It’s a credit to the Russo brothers (who cut their teeth directing the “Captain America” films), that this story is as coherent as it is. There is not a single wasted minute in it’s 2:40 play time. From the first scene, it is up and running at full tilt. It can do that partly because no exposition is needed. They can assume that every audience member knows every character already. The biggest unknown was Thanos, and movies fail on poorly written villains. Fortunately, he is one of the best we have seen in the genre. He is incredibly powerful and complex. Though he wants to do monstrous things, it seems to genuinely come from a twisted sense of compassion. That makes him a fantastic character to watch. It can almost feel like a shame that he has to share screen time with so many others. Wisely, the Russos never bring all the characters together in the same scene; that would have been chaos. Instead, the film toggles between disparate scenes all over the galaxy, each with its own characters, goals, and story arc. This effectively allows each member of a huge cast to shine to some degree. The pace may be too much for some people. A legitimate criticism might be that the film is relentless. But, for a true fan, this will feel like payoff, especially in the final minutes of the film. It’s remarkable how tightly guarded the script has been. The internet abounded with theories as to what would happen; I am pleased to say that most were wrong. I was not expecting how the final 10-15 minutes played out. If I have one criticism, it is that I think they overplayed their hand a bit in the final scene. It might have been more impactful had it not been so extreme. When it started, I heard gasps in my audience. By the time it was done, we all knew the long-term implications would be more blunted than they initially appeared. Small quibbles aside, this was a fun ride that definitely left me ready for more. I can’t wait for Phase 2 of the MCU to unfold. If it is anywhere near as successful as Phase 1, we’ll be watching superheroes for decades more to come.

Lean on Pete

April 22, 2018 at 6:44 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment

◊ ◊ ◊ ½

Don’t let the previews fool you; this is not a feel good movie about a boy rescuing a horse, with a triumphant, inspirational ending. If you want “Seabiscuit” or “The Black Stallion,” look elsewhere. This is a far more nuanced story about loss, love, resiliency, and growing up. Charley is a 16 year old whose mother ran away when he was young and his father is barely making ends meet. He is living on the razor’s edge between dirt poor poverty and being absolutely destitute. He takes a job, falls in love with a horse named “Lean on Pete,” and runs away with him. Most of the film happens as they make their way across the country, trying to rely on strangers to get by. What makes this film work is the strength of all the characters along the journey. The film is based on the novel by Willie Vlautin and was adapted for the screen and directed by Andrew Haigh. Haigh’s other two full-length films are the brilliant “45 Years” and “Weekend;” both of which I absolutely loved. He is a master at creating natural sounding dialogue and getting very real performances from his actors. Charley is played by Charlie Plummer, who got his start on “Boardwalk Empire” and was recently seen in “All the Money in the World.” He is a solid young actor who gave a sweet, moving performance. While Charley is the entire focus of the film and is in every single scene, a great cast of characters come in and out of the story, including ones played by Steve Buscemi, Chloë Sevigny, and Steve Zahn. All of these characters seem entirely believable. Charley faces real struggles, as he finds he has to live by his own wits. But, along the way, Charley (and the audience) discovers how strong he really is. The ending is not showy or spectacular. It is much more like real life. Some things work out the way you intended, and some don’t. But, if you can be resilient, something, some how, will work out in the end.

 

Oh Lucy!

April 9, 2018 at 4:13 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

½

“Oh Lucy!” feels like a movie that had something worthwhile to say, if I just could have paid better attention. Setsuko feels unfulfilled in her dead-end office job in Tokyo. Her niece, Mika, asks her to attend an English class that Mika can no longer go to. Setsuko is confused and then charmed by the unconventional teacher, John. But then he and Mika disappear to America, so Setsuko and her sister head off in pursuit. The film is sometimes funny, sometimes touching, sometimes insightful, and sometimes just odd. As the very strange love-triangle between Setsuko, John, and Mika plays out, there are some moments that feel really honest and moving. But they get quickly swallowed by many more moments that just feel weird and creepy. Some of the characters’ actions are so inexplicable (particularly Setsuko’s) that it can be genuinely hard to be sympathetic. In the end, the film required more work than I was willing to put in. I found my attention wandering and, by the time the credits rolled, I felt like there had probably been something worth seeing there; I just hadn’t seen it.

A Quiet Place

April 9, 2018 at 3:57 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ½

If you had asked me 10 years ago what my least favorite genre of film was, I would have told you musicals (it still is, in fact). But, if you had asked my second least favorite genre, I would have said horror. I grew up believing that I hated horror movies, all the while consuming any Hitchcock I could get my hands on (“Wait Until Dark” was my favorite film in my mid-teens). I didn’t equate those films with the slashers I had come to associate with horror. I have only very rarely enjoyed a slasher film (“Scream” being the clearest example), but I love a film that is creepy, tense, and anxiety producing. And over the last few years, as the industry has become more open to films outside the slasher sub-genre, I have discovered some amazing ones (e.g.  “The Babadook,” “It Follows,” “Get Out“). Consider this one as a noble addition to that list. Taking place in the very near future, the story follows a family trying to survive against some undefined evil that has spread throughout the world. The creatures are attracted to sound, so they have to be very very quiet. Here is a piece of advice: don’t see this film in a loud theater. A lot of the film happens in silence and you will hear every crinkle of cellophane, every slurp from a cup, every whispered comment. Setting that aside, the film drew me in from the first scene. That scene is beautifully crafted and plays with audience expectations brilliantly. By the time it ends, you know what’s at stake. It’s a fantastic way to build audience investment. The film also builds tension well. It has only a few jump-in-your-seat scenes, but it does has a continual sense of dread and anxiety that was rarely abated. What made the film most effective is that it was ultimately a family story. In that sense, it reminded me so much of the brilliant, “The Road.” The story is really about how you keep those you love alive in a world of perpetual violence. As such, this film could be a metaphor for so many things happening in so many parts of the world right now. John Krasinski, who is best known for his role in the American version of “The Office,” starred as the father, directed, executive produced, and co-wrote the film. His real-life wife, Emily Blunt, plays his wife in the film. This was clearly an important film to him and his passion shows in his performance. If you ever needed to be convinced that Krasinski can be more than a goofy comedic actor, see this film. Likewise, Blunt is terrific as a mother desperate to protect her kids. The daughter is played by Millicent Simmonds, who is hearing-impaired in real life. Her character’s inability to hear is played off of the creatures’ super-hearing is some very effective ways. Lastly, Noah Jupe plays the young son. His performance reminded me of Kodi Smit-McPhee’s in “The Road.” Both did a terrific job of looking anxious and scared all the time. In a film with essentially just a small cast, everyone needs to be on point and they were. This was a strong film: it had great characters, a solid plot device, a good story arc, and some genuinely creepy scenes. If you want a film that will keep you on edge and not bathe you in blood, this is the one for you.

Ready Player One

April 2, 2018 at 11:23 am | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ½

I find it hard to judge a movie whose book I read first. There are very few times when a movie is as good as, or better than, the book that inspired it (the LOTR series, as an example). Now, let’s be clear, “Ready Player One” is no masterwork of fiction. It’s light, easy sci-fi that can be read in a few days and likely forgotten in a few months. It probably would not even factor into this review, except that I just read the book and so, it was fresh in my mind. I was keenly aware of how much exposition was necessary, particularly in the beginning of the film, to set the stage for the audience. Yet, I was also aware of how much was being left out. That said, the two people I saw the film with, who had not read the book, did not seem to think that the story was unclear. But there was a lot left out that I thought really helped build out this world. I also could not help but be aware of all the changes that were made, some of which blunted any emotional impact the book had. What you do get is a fast-paced story that tries to balance world-building with action and stunning visuals. That makes sense. The book was very visual, describing in detail the various virtual locations the story moves through. It’s a testament to how far (and how fast) visual effects have progressed, that nobody is talking about the look of this film. We spend a lot of time looking at beautifully rendered virtual faces and they are really quite impressive. There is a scene that takes place in the hotel from “The Shining,” and it looked like a real set; with only a couple of exceptions, that hotel looked photo-real. The real reason this book has made any splash (and was even made into a movie) is that it is rife with 80s references. An action/sci-fi/virtual reality movie with 80s references just seems like it would appeal to everyone from 15-55, and Hollywood must love those numbers. So, if you’re in the mood for some nostalgia, open your mouth and waddle up to the hose. There are so many pop culture references (from the 60s through the 90s) in every single scene, you might wish you could pause the movie to catch them all. And you still won’t catch them all. One of my friends burst out laughing at one point. Apparently, the spell being used was taken verbatim from the 1981 movie “Excalibur.” Who knew? Apparently, nobody else in my audience. This film can be a fun ride but, be aware, it is all spectacle and no depth. The one “message” about the importance of living in the real world is so tacked on and saccharine that it almost feels sarcastic. If you want a goofy good time, see this film. Just don’t expect it to stick with you. Spielberg has made masterpieces that will stay with me my whole life. Five years from now, I won’t even remember what this movie was about.

Isle of Dogs

April 1, 2018 at 10:12 am | Posted in 2018 | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ½

“Rushmore” was the first Wes Anderson film I saw and I have seen every single full-length film he’s made since then. They are almost always great films and some of them (“The Royal Tenenbaums,” “Moonrise Kingdom”) are brilliant. This film is one of his best. “Isle of Dogs” (read “I Love Dogs”) takes place in an alternate universe where Japan is ruled by the cat-loving Kobayashi family. Mayor Kobayashi has hatched a plan to send all of the dogs to a garbage dump island off the coast from Megasaki, the city he runs. His nephew then goes to the island looking for his displaced dog and therein lies the story. The dogs’ barks have all been “translated” into English, while the humans speak in mostly untranslated Japanese. We are aligned with the dogs and, like them, have no idea what the humans are saying, just as they don’t understand the dogs. It’s a clever conceit that mostly works, though Anderson does have to find creative ways for the audience to understand enough human speech to move the plot along. Anderson is beloved (just look at the list of starts in the tags under the film’s title in this review). He is the master of beautiful, odd, quirky, endearing stories and this film is all of that in droves. The visual images in this stop-motion film are truly stunning. Scene after scene, I was captured by the beauty and attention to detail. The characters are all charming, funny and lovable in a very Anderson sort of way. At his heart, Anderson is an optimist about human beings; he believes in our basic goodness and that, underneath all of our weirdness, we all want to connect. That very sweet notion infuses his films. Here, dogs are metaphors for the best parts of us: loyalty, bravery, sacrifice, love. Beyond just a cute story, Anderson is playing with far deeper issues. At times, the story works as a (sometimes heavy-handed) metaphor for fascism and the importance of resistance against tyranny. But its real strength comes when it sticks with the broader themes of love and connection. When “Isle of Dogs” takes us there, it is as charming a film as you’ll see all year.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.