Ramen Heads

March 29, 2018 at 6:16 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊

This sweet Japanese documentary is the perfect companion to 2012’s “Jiro Dreams of Sushi.” That film focused on Japanese love for sushi and told us the story of one man who had built a 3-star Michelin guide restaurant in a crowded corner of a Tokyo subway stop. There, he served meals that cost hundreds of dollars. The film was beautifully shot and placidly paced. There was a sort of Zen beauty to it that seemed to match the elegant simplicity of sushi. This film takes us into the entirely different world of ramen. We spend most of the film with Osama Tomita, who has just been crowned for the 3rd year in a row as having the best ramen in Japan. In his tiny restaurant, he serves meals that cost around $8 each. Sushi may be gourmet, but ramen is the everyman’s food. This film has a frenetic energy and earnestness that was absent from “Jiro.” These kitchens are full of bubbling pots containing countless mysterious ingredients. Each ramen chef has his/her own secret way of doing it. You get to meet several and watch them working. This was quite an education into the various types of ramen that exist. Filmmaker Koki Shigeno is such an earnest storyteller that it’s hard not to get caught up in his rapture. He is clearly one of the “ramen heads” he is describing and his adoration is infectious. After watching the love and effort that goes into these recipes, and after watching bowl after bowl of beautiful soup put in front of you, I challenge anyone to not leave the theater hungry.

Love, Simon

March 25, 2018 at 9:59 am | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊ ◊

Let me take you on a journey. Or perhaps I should call this review, “how I learned to relax and love Simon.” My first red flag was that the theater was filled with adolescent girls. I was one of 3-4 adults and one of maybe 2-3 men. At one point in the film, the titular Simon (Nick Robinson, from another YA film, “Everything, Everything” and “Jurassic World”) refers to his choice of a Jackson 5 song as “twee.” That struck me as everything wrong with this movie. No kid uses the word “twee” and, in fact, his use of that word pointed out just how twee the entire film was. This is the type of story that has no footing in the real world. Nobody acts like they normally would. The kids are all too cool, clever, and self aware. The adults are impossibly wise, hip and (yes) self-aware. None of the adults talk to these kids the way real adults do. This is especially true at the school, where the vice-principal (the always funny Tony Hale from “Veep” and “Community”) and drama teacher (Natasha Rothwell) act in ways that are much more designed to make the audience laugh than to be remotely believable. This is a perky, happy community, where even the bad kids are laughably bad at being bad. Director Greg Berlanti (from most of the WB’s superhero shows) has made a clear choice to eschew realism for sentiment. You see, Simon is a young man struggling with his sexuality; he does not want to ruin his perfect life by letting his family and best-friends know he’s gay. But then another student announces anonymously on the school social media site that he is gay. They begin to correspond, both using pseudonyms, and Simon falls in love with this unknown person. It is an interesting conceit because the audience becomes invested in who it might be. But the entire film is just a build up to that final reveal, with everything along the way existing to check various humorous or sentimental boxes, without exploring anything remotely close to truth. In fact, when it gets it’s closest to truth (when Simon makes a series of really selfish choices), it takes the easy way out, allowing for a pat solution, rather than exploring the difficult, real-life consequences of those choices.  Sitting in the theater, thinking about films like “Moonlight” and “Call Me by Your Name” that tried very hard to get at something real, I found myself annoyed by the artifice. But then, something started to happen. I became invested in the emotional arc the film was taking. Despite myself, I liked Simon and I wanted things to work out for him. I was as invested as those thirteen-year-old girls (well, maybe not “as invested.” Let’s just say “invested”) in finding out who “Blue” was. The ending was unbelievably sentimental and phony and a little bit silly and it worked. I was swept up in those final moments, maybe partly because the entire theater had erupted in squeals, clapping, crying, and full-on Beatlemania screaming. Or, maybe, just because it was done well. And it occurred to me that Berlanti had made the perfect YA movie. I was never the audience, but it still managed to affect me. I think that says something. Halfway through the film, I was taking mental notes at how annoyed I was. But, I walked out of the theater emotionally spent and feeling oddly nostalgic for the passion of youth. I can’t really hate a movie that took me there, no matter what the journey was like.

 

The Death of Stalin

March 24, 2018 at 11:44 am | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊

“The Death of Stalin” is a sometimes funny, sometimes interesting, oft times grim look at the struggle for power after Stalin’s death. Director and writer Armando Iannucci tries to do for Russian politics what he did for the U.S. and Britain with the parody “In The Loop.” That film was often screamingly funny and shockingly foul-mouth, thanks largely to actor Peter Capaldi (the previous “Doctor Who”). This film gets there occasionally but far less often and far less successfully. This may be partly because these actors, fine as they are, do not approach the material with the same caustic indignation Capaldi did. Jason Isaacs (the “Harry Potter” films, “Star Trek: Discovery”) came the closest, but his role was too small and his delivery was not quite as masterful as Capaldi’s. But, I think the real problem is the source material. It is far easier to laugh at the absurdity of American and British politics, which feels comfortably like laughing at oneself, than it is to laugh at the grisly chain of events taking place in the power vacuum left by Stalin. The film is a barrage of casual slaughter, both mentioned and witnessed, that we are supposed to laugh at, partly in the absurdity of how casually it is treated. But that is a joke that can take the viewers only so far without also wearing us down. I felt my audience wanting to laugh (I think we had all come expecting good, silly fun), and we all tried gamely. But, in the end, we mostly sat in silence. I did learn something about the machinations within the Soviet government that would eventually lead to Khrushchev taking control. But I might have enjoyed that more in a drama or even a thriller; all the silliness seemed to make light of it. I do get the desire to point out the absurdity in government and I loved it in “In The Loop.” It just didn’t particularly work well for me here.

 

Thoroughbreds

March 14, 2018 at 8:15 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , ,

◊ ½

With “Thoroughbreds,” first time director/writer, Cory Finley wants to make his mark on Hollywood with the “Heathers” of this generation. But, as dark as “Heathers” was, you always knew who you were rooting for. It was a scream against self-involved, vapid youth that every uncool kid could relate to. This film feels like the opposite. There is nobody to root for here, because every character is some form of despicable. The vapid, self-involved kids are the stars of this story and I found it impossible to care about them or their actions at all. Amanda and Lily are played by Olivia Cooke (“Me and Earl and The Dying Girl”) and Anya Taylor-Joy (“The Witch,” “Split”), respectively. Over the course of the film, they vie back and forth for which one is the biggest sociopath. Eventually, they rope in the hapless loser Tim, played by Anton Yelchin (“The Green Room,” the newest “Star Trek” films), in sadly one of his last roles before his untimely death. All three are solid actors and they play their characters well. In fact, this film is entirely well-crafted. I have no complaint about any of the acting, the dialogue, the cinematography, the music (or lack of it). The use of sound and silence was particularly interesting in this film. Finley did a great job of creating creepiness. I can see why many people would like this movie. I just despised every single character and every choice they made. Which made it hard to sit through, and even harder to enjoy.

The Party

March 7, 2018 at 7:33 pm | Posted in 2018 | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

◊ ◊

This black-and-white British film was small in scope and fairly modest in its intentions. It was not trying to say anything big, nor was it trying to make a cultural impact, nor did it even seem to want to move the audience. In fact, I had a hard time trying to figure out why writer/director Sally Potter made it at all. The only other film of hers I have seen is the brilliant, audacious “Orlando” (1992) that helped make Tilda Swinton a star. She has only made a handle full of other movies in the intervening 25 years. And this one could not be more different from that one. Where “Orlando” spanned centuries and vast distances, “The Party” takes place in one home over one night. It very much reminded me of early 20th Century plays, in which a common trope was to trap people in a house someplace and see was bitterness ruptures forth over the course of a day, a night or a weekend (think O’Neill’s “Long Day’s Journey Into Night,” Williams’s “The Night of the Iguana,” or Albee’s “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?”). This party is to celebrate Janet’s (Kristin Scott Thomas) promotion to Minister of Health. But, as it turns out, nobody is in the celebrating mood, for various reasons. The party devolves as egos fracture and darkness seeps into the room. By the end, there is a permanent emotional wreckage and an impending rash decision that will likely destroy everything. This is not fun stuff, but it can be powerful and cathartic. Unfortunately, it wasn’t. Potter never fully commits to the drama. Instead, she attempts to lighten the mood with black humor. Some of it is funny (most of the best lines belong to Patricia Clarkson), but it never becomes funny enough to make this film an effective comedy. All the humor succeeds in doing is blunting the pathos. And, at a slender 71 minutes, it barely gets started before it’s over. Each of the characters had complex stories and complicated relationships, all of which could only be touched on in the short time we had. What a shame. There was some fantastic material here. And a fantastic cast that included, Thomas, Clarkson, Timothy Spall, Emily Mortimer, Cillian Murphy, Cherry Jones, and Bruno Ganz. I didn’t leave the theater feeling like I had wasted my time (it was too short for that). Instead, I left feeling like there was wasted potential. There was a much better movie lying undiscovered just below the surface of this strange little film.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.